Ivana Lisjak vs Claire Feuerstein Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L L L L W L W
Form
L L W W W L L L L LHead To Head: Lisjak 1 - 0 Feuerstein
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lisjak winning 2 and Feuerstein winning 0. The last match between Lisjak and Feuerstein was at the Grenoble, 24-01-2011, First, I.hard with Ivana Lisjak getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ivana Lisjak | 1 |
| Claire Feuerstein | 0 |
Grenoble(24-01-2011)
7
6
6
1
| Lisjak | Stats | Feuerstein |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 95 | Highest Rank | 110 |
| 38 | Age | 39 |
| R | Plays | L |
| 6 | Titles | 11 |
| 57% (171-131) | Career Total W/L | 56% (282-222) |
| $113,665 | Career Prize Money | $188,486 |
| 1 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Agut VS Clar PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Maneiro VS Frech PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Lisjak VS Feuerstein H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-1 | |||||
Lisjak VS Feuerstein H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ivana Lisjak Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 5-7 7-6(5) 1-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats 
Sesil Karatantcheva
Player
Ivana Lisjak
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
99)
4
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
10
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
51 of
99)
104
Total Points Won
83
|
6-7(6) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 4-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Alla Kudryavtseva
Player
Ivana Lisjak
47%
(
28 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
17 of
28)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Claire Feuerstein Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Quirine Lemoine
Player
Claire Feuerstein
67%
(
74 of
111)
1st Serve %
64%
(
78 of
122)
0
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
7
73%
(
54 of
74)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
38%
(
42 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
50 of
122)
119
Total Points Won
114
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Claire Feuerstein
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
9
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Olga Saez Larra
Player
Claire Feuerstein
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kiki Bertens
Player
Claire Feuerstein
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve %
45%
(
33 of
73)
4
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
5
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
23 of
33)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
33%
(
25 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(9) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Claire Feuerstein
Player
Silvia Soler-Espinosa
62%
(
51 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
38 of
71)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
2-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Claire Feuerstein
Player
Xenia Knoll
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
2
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Claire Feuerstein
Player
Jesika Maleckova
56%
(
38 of
68)
1st Serve %
43%
(
26 of
61)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sherazad Reix
Player
Claire Feuerstein
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
27 of
55)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
44%
(
24 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (171/131) | Win/Loss | 56% (282/222) |
| 56% (381/296) | Sets Win/Loss | 55% (629/525) |
| 53% (3225/2868) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5546/5148) |
| 50% (52/51) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (58/56) |
| 60% (79/52) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (72/80) |
| 62% (40/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65% (148/79) |
| 0% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 105 | Aces Total | 455 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 366 | Total Double Faults | 379 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 558.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 591.34 |
| 59% (2246/3792) | 1st Serve % | 59% (5308/9045) |
| 62% (1399/2246) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (3480/5308) |
| 41% (636/1556) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (1762/3737) |
| 47% (224/480) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (380/907) |
| 45% (1698/3770) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3568/8858) |
| 46% (13/15) | Slam W/L | 38% (14/23) |
| 50% (7/7) | Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (31/33) | Main Tour W/L | 43% (20/27) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 62% (114/69) | Challenger W/L | 56% (181/143) |
| 75% (6/2) | Futures W/L | 70% (66/28) |
| 57% (169/297) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (279/497) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (27/57) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (75/141) |
| 48% (37/77) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (85/153) |
| 88% (169/148) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (290/248) |
| 12% (169/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (290/40) |
| 16% (133/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (214/34) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
